Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Why does surrendering require someone to abandon?. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Why does surrendering require someone to abandon?. Afficher tous les articles

mercredi 1 avril 2015

Why does surrendering require someone to abandon?

So you go through several rounds and the score looks like this for your team:

2/0/6

1/0/6

0/1/6

0/0/6

0/0/6

vs the enemy (who's better than you, or your team sucks or they're hacking).

9/2/1

7/1/0

5/3/0

5/0/1

4/1/1



Why does it require someone leaving just to end the game? It's pretty clear the losing team doesn't have a shot (okay there are miracles that happen, but realistically this is going to end with a 16/0 score so why if there's 5 people who wish to resign can't do so?

Or take scenario #2 you've got a griefer you kicked. And it's 5v4 against an already better team (granted you can take over a bot provided it isn't picked before that) and it's the same hopeless situation. Why does a player who has been kicked not suffice as enough reason to vote to surrender?



I believe that surrendering should:

1.) Be an option if you're losing by a 5 round split.

2.) You kicked someone on the basis of being an idiot and don't want to fight a losing battle (I'm aware that this might be abused, but believe it's preferable to being stuck in some game vs a hacker who's just going to farm kills). (Again the vote must be unanimous, if there's even one who wishes to try to comeback, that's their decision).



TL;DR Allow surrenders if the losing team is 5+ rounds behind or if a player is kicked.



Any thoughts?

Why does surrendering require someone to abandon?

Popular Posts

Categories

Unordered List

Text Widget

Followers

Fourni par Blogger.